In the Nota Bene section of the December 12 issue (“Science and Spirituality,” The Chronicle Review), Evan R. Goldstein refers to intelligent design as “anti-rational and anti-intellectual” and lumps ...

In declaring that Intelligent Design isn't science and shouldn't be taught in science classes, biologists have often suggested that it might belong in philosophy or religion courses. So why weren't ...

What happens when science starts asking the same questions as philosophy, and maybe even theology? That’s exactly where “The Story of Everything” lands. The upcoming docufilm, led by physicist and ...

SEATTLE — Alone among developed nations, America has not wholeheartedly embraced Darwinian evolution. Polls reveal that as many reject it as accept it, and this has been cited as proof of American ...

Conclusions About Intelligent Design: Intelligent Design is fundamentally religious. This conclusion is based primarily on ID leaders' and their supporters' views of it as stated in their own words, ...

SEATTLE — Critics of intelligent design seem to think it’s a code word for “creationism.” It’s no wonder they think so, say some of its proponents. Many creationists are making the same mistake. The ...

Opening Billboard: Funding for this program is provided by the Bernard and Irene Schwartz Foundation, the Smith Richardson Foundation, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. WATTENBERG: Hello, ...

In a broad and withering opinion, a federal judge ruled last month that intelligent design was nothing more than creationism in disguise and that it was therefore unconstitutional to teach it in a ...

Should intelligent design be taught in schools? Larry poses the question to John Mark Reynolds, Associate Professor of Philosophy at Biola University, and Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic ...