Anthropic launches AI agents to review developer pull requests. Internal tests tripled meaningful code review feedback. Automated reviews may catch critical bugs humans miss. Anthropic today announced ...

A monthly overview of things you need to know as an architect or aspiring architect. Unlock the full InfoQ experience by logging in! Stay updated with your favorite authors and topics, engage with ...

AI thrives on data but feeding it the right data is harder than it seems. As enterprises scale their AI initiatives, they face the challenge of managing diverse data pipelines, ensuring proximity to ...

You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email. Anthropic gave Claude a new job: reviewing code. But some developers say the new feature could chip ...

Claude Code 2.0 as it has been labelled by some introduces new features aimed at improving coding workflows and handling complex tasks more effectively. One notable addition is the “By the Way” ...

A recent Stack Overflow survey found that more than 84% of developers are already using or planning to use AI tools in their workflow. After trying OpenAI Codex for myself, I understand why. Like many ...

When it comes to coding, peer feedback is crucial for catching bugs early, maintaining consistency across a codebase, and improving overall software quality. The rise of “vibe coding” — using AI tools ...

Anthropic has introduced a new AI-powered Code Review system aimed at easing one of the biggest bottlenecks in software development: reviewing pull requests. In a recent blog post, the company ...

As AI coding tools generate billions of lines of code each month, a new bottleneck is emerging: ensuring that software works as intended. Qodo, a startup building AI agents for code review, testing, ...